For decades, there has been major confusion regarding what waters are regulated under the Clean Water Act.
The United States Supreme Court can change this by agreeing to hear a case brought by the Pacific Legal Foundation. In its petition asking the court to hear the case, Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency, the Pacific Legal Foundation presents a simple question: should United States v. Rapanos be revisited to adopt the plurality opinion’s standard for regulated wetlands?
In 2006, the late Justice Antonin Scalia in Rapanos provided much-needed clarity on what waters are covered under the Clean Water Act, and specifically what […]
Click here to visit source. www.dailysignal.com